Intelligence you can defend, not just a number you have to trust.
Modash is a well-built creator discovery and analytics platform. It does audience filtering and influencer search well. Pinkk is optimised for a different job: giving teams defensible, verifiable partner intelligence — with transparent pricing, no discovery call required, and reports that can be independently confirmed.
The things that actually differ
Both tools analyse influencer and partner profiles. The differences are in methodology, verifiability, pricing model, and who each product is optimised for.
Verifiable reports
Every Pinkk report carries a PKK reference number. Anyone can confirm it's genuine at /verify — without accessing the report content. Modash reports exist inside the platform only; there's no independent verification system.
Conservative by design
Pinkk flags confidence levels on every finding and surfaces uncertain signals rather than smoothing them into a clean score. Modash presents audience quality metrics as definitive — which can feel more certain than the underlying data actually supports.
Pricing you can see without a call
Pinkk pricing is public at /pricing. Modash publishes plans, but full feature access and higher-volume usage typically involve a conversation. Neither approach is wrong — it depends whether you want self-serve or a managed onboarding.
Pinkk vs Modash — side by side
A fair, factual comparison. Modash is a capable tool — we've noted where it's genuinely stronger. Use this to decide what matters for your use case.
| Area | Pinkk | Modash |
|---|---|---|
| Getting started | Self-serve in minutes. Free starter credits, no credit card required. | Free trial available. Signing up is self-serve but higher tiers involve a sales conversation. |
| Pricing transparency | All plans and prices fully public. No call required to see what anything costs. | Plans published, but enterprise pricing and higher-volume access involve a sales conversation. |
| Team access model | Shared credit pool across the team. No per-seat billing — members don't each need their own plan. | Per-seat model on some plans. Adding team members can increase cost. |
| Report verifiability | PKK reference number on every report. Publicly verifiable at /verify. Embeddable badge for sharing. | Reports live inside the platform. No independent verification or shareable reference system. |
| Analysis methodology | Conservative, evidence-based. Confidence levels on findings. Uncertain signals flagged, not hidden. | Algorithmic audience quality scores. Presented as metrics rather than confidence-rated assessments. |
| Compliance documentation | Reports designed for audit trails. PKK references provide independent, timestamped evidence for compliance sign-off. | Not structured around compliance documentation. Reports are for internal decision-making, not external verification. |
| iGaming support | Purpose-built iGaming vertical with geo-compliance signals, bonus laundering detection patterns, and MGA/UKGC documentation framing. | General-purpose platform. iGaming-specific signals and compliance framing not a documented focus. |
| API access | REST API with bearer auth, scoped tokens, and OpenAPI spec. Included in subscriber plans. Reference → | API available on higher plans. Scope and access tied to plan tier. |
| Creator discovery | You bring the profiles. Optimised for depth on a defined set of partners. | Large searchable database with demographic and audience filters. Modash is strong here. |
| Scheduled monitoring | Automated re-runs on daily, weekly, or monthly schedules. Partner risk is tracked over time. | Monitoring features available. Depth and automation tied to plan tier. |
| Your data | Not sold, not used to train models. Export or delete anytime. | Standard SaaS data practices. Data use terms worth reviewing for your use case. |
Based on publicly available information about Modash as of 2025–2026. Features and pricing change — verify directly at modash.io for the current picture. If anything here is inaccurate, let us know.
When Modash makes more sense
We're not the right tool for every workflow. There are situations where Modash is the stronger choice.
Discovery-first workflows
If you regularly need to find new creators by audience demographic, location, or engagement rate from a large indexed pool, Modash's discovery tooling is built for that. Pinkk is optimised for analysing partners you've already identified, not broad discovery.
Audience demographic filtering
Modash has detailed audience demographic filters — age, gender, location, interests — that let you find creators whose audiences match a specific target profile. That level of demographic search isn't what Pinkk is built for.
Campaign workflow management
Modash includes features for managing outreach, tracking deliverables, and reporting on campaign performance. If you need a single tool to run the whole campaign workflow, Pinkk doesn't cover that scope.
Where Pinkk is the stronger fit
Your decisions need to be documented
If your team needs to show evidence that a partner was vetted — for a compliance audit, a regulated client, or internal governance — Pinkk's verifiable PKK references are built for that. A Modash report screenshot doesn't carry the same weight as an independently verifiable reference number tied to a timestamped analysis.
You're working in iGaming
Pinkk was built for iGaming and digital communities. Bonus laundering patterns, geo-compliance exposure, MGA/UKGC documentation framing — these aren't bolt-ons, they're core to how the product works. Modash is a general platform without that vertical depth.
You want certainty about what you're paying
Pinkk pricing is fully public. You don't need to speak to anyone to understand what a subscription costs or what's included. If transparent pricing and self-serve onboarding matter to you, that's a real difference.
You want to share findings externally
The PKK verification system means you can share a report reference with a client, partner, or regulator without giving platform access. The embeddable badge works in proposals and media kits. Modash doesn't have an equivalent shareable verification layer.
Before you decide
Sanity-check before you commit
Before signing a contract with any platform, run a free creator check. These tools take seconds and give you a baseline read — no login, no credit card, no commitment.
Engagement Rate Calculator
Benchmark a creator's likes, comments, and views against platform tiers. See whether engagement patterns match the follower count — before you pay for a report or sign a deal.
Open calculatorFake Follower Estimator
Check whether follower count and engagement patterns look coherent together. A quick gut-check before committing budget — or before deciding whether a full intelligence report is worth running.
Open estimatorThese are free, no-login tools. If the numbers look concerning, upgrade to a full Intelligence Report for a structured, verifiable analysis with confidence-rated findings.
Also comparing Pinkk against other tools?
Try it for yourself — no sales call needed.
Run your first Intelligence Report in minutes. See what verifiable, conservative analysis looks like in practice. Free starter credits on signup — no credit card required.
Free starter credits on signup. No credit card required.