Stop trusting metrics. Start making decisions you can stand behind.
The intelligence report you can hand to a client, a CFO, or a compliance review.
Most tools give you a confident-looking score and ask you to take it on faith. Pinkk is built the other way around: conservative analysis, confidence-rated findings, and reports anyone can verify publicly.
Why teams choose Pinkk
Not more metrics. Better decisions — with evidence you can check, share, and stand behind.
Conservative when it matters
Every analysis uses cautious, evidence-based language. We surface what the data supports and flag what is uncertain. A result that says “we’re not sure” is more useful than one that sounds certain and isn’t.
Reports anyone can verify
Each report carries a reference number (PKK-XXXX-XXXX). Clients confirm it at /verify without an account.
The report is the product
Structured Intelligence Reports with labelled sections and confidence levels — not a vanity dashboard. Export PDF, add analyst notes, share private links, then Go Deeper on any finding.
Creators, brands, and affiliates
Same disciplined report shape for every profile type, with intelligence lenses for iGaming, Creators & Media, Finance & FinTech, or General.
Self-serve in minutes
Create an account, add a profile, run an analysis. No sales call, no demo gate, no credit card to start — free starter credits on signup.
Transparent and reliable
Uptime is monitored externally and published on a public status page. Last 30 days: 99.94% uptime. Your data is not sold and not used to train models — export or delete anytime.
A different approach to intelligence
Most tools give you a number and ask you to trust it. Pinkk gives you evidence and asks you to think about it.
| Pinkk approach | Common alternative |
|---|---|
| Structured intelligence with labelled sections | Raw metrics dashboard requiring manual interpretation |
| Confidence-rated findings per section | Single opaque score with no reasoning shown |
| Publicly verifiable reports with PKK reference numbers | Black-box results the recipient must accept on faith |
| Uncertainty shown explicitly, not papered over | Overconfident output regardless of evidence quality |
| Analyst interprets evidence and decides | Automated judgment the analyst is expected to act on |
| Go Deeper follow-up on specific findings | Static report with no path to deeper investigation |
Grades reflect evidence — not verdicts
Pinkk assigns an overall A–F grade based on the strength, clarity, and consistency of evidence across all completed analyses. A lower grade may indicate insufficient data, conflicting signals, or areas needing further investigation — not that a profile is definitively problematic.
A result that says "the evidence here is limited" is more valuable than one that invents certainty where none exists.
How grading is calculatedThe analyst makes the call
Pinkk is not a fraud detector, an identity verification service, or an automated accusation engine. It surfaces evidence and makes uncertainty explicit.
The analyst reads the findings, weighs the confidence levels, decides what needs further investigation, and makes the final decision. Pinkk is designed to amplify professional judgment — not replace it.
See all capabilitiesHow it works
Three steps. No procurement maze. The report is ready to share when you are.
01
Add a profile
Connect platforms, pick an intelligence lens for your niche, and add only the context that helps — or autofill it.
02
Run an analysis
Pinkk runs structured research across quality, risk, search, and reputation signals — confidence-rated by section.
03
Decide and share
Export, verify, compare two shortlist options, or dig into a single finding with Go Deeper.
Stop trusting metrics. Start shipping evidence.
Add a creator, brand, or affiliate. Run an Intelligence Report you can verify, export, and defend. Free starter credits — no credit card required.